Burning a Path

Opening the eyes of millions…

The Judicial Branch

This is a Free Response Question for my AP Government Class, neglecting sleep I was able to finish it.

Q: The judicial branch is designed to be more independent of public opinion than are the legislature or the executive. Yet, the United States Supreme Court rarely deviates too far long from prevalent public opinion.

a. Describe two ways in which the United States Supreme Court is insulated from public opinion.

b. Explain how two factors work to keep the United States Supreme Court from deviating too far from public opinion.

A:

The Judicial Branch

FRQ # 3

James Mulroy

The Judiciary power of the United States is invested in the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court handles such cases as;

“law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;–to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;–to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;–to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;–to controversies between two or more states;–between a state and citizens of another state;–between citizens of different states;–between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects.”

as stated in the US Constitution, Article III, Section 2. The Supreme Court is insulated from public opinion for two main contentions; 1) the Supreme Court Justices are appointed by the president not the people, and 2) They may hold an office indefinitely until either death, retirement, or impeachment. However, even though the Supreme Court is insulated from public opinion, they tend to keep close to public opinion for the following two contentions; 1) as stated in the US Constitution, Article III, Section 1;

The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior”

which states that a judiciary shall hold their office during “good behavior,” not stating that they cannot be kicked from office, and 2) the Judiciary is usually made up of judges from different points in time, meaning they hold their office indefinitely, and later when one retires, dies, or is impeached, a new judge is appointed, and therefore a mix of judges with different opinions and views work together. They are able to debate and pick the best solution for the nation, which hopefully and usually agrees with public opinion.

The Supreme Court is insulated from public opinion, because the Supreme Court Justices are appointed by the president not the people. The Supreme Court Justices are elected or appointed by the president, and in some cases may not truly represent the people of the United States. Even though the president is elected by the people through the Electoral College, he/she may not truly represent the people. For example, Richard Nixon held an approval rating of 51% in 1973 previous to Watergate according to CNN, and after word dropped to a low of 39% when Watergate was in full swing according to thinkprogress.org. Surely the people didn’t approve of Nixon, and surely enough, he had the power as president to appoint a Judge if there were a space. This judge probably would not represent the people, as the judge would most likely have the same views as Nixon. Another current example is George W. Bush, after his State of the Union Address, his approval rating dropped to 28% according to CBS as of January 22, 2007. Surely any Judge appointed by Bush Jr. would not be in favor of public opinion.

The Supreme Court is insulated from public, because they may hold an office indefinitely until either death, retirement, or impeachment. As stated in the US Constitution, Article III, Section 1, Judges may hold their position by good behavior. There is no precise standard for determining whether a justice has committed an impeachable offense, according to MSN Encarta Encyclopedia. However if removed, the reason should be assumed for criminal or ethical lapses, not for partisan political reasons. No justice has ever been removed; however in 1805 Samuel Chase was impeached by the House by his political enemies, but the Senate did not remove Chase from office when it became apparent that Chase’s opponents were after him, because they disagreed with his decisions, not that he had done any wrong doings. Abe Fortas was nearly convicted in 1969, but left office after accepting a questionable fee from a private organization, and some conservative groups rallied for the removal of Chief Justice Earl Warren in the 1960s, but failed. History has shown that; yes, a justice may be removed by impeachment, however it is very hard, and the chances are little. They also have no term limit, and may stay until death. Therefore a Justice may act as they wish without consent of the public.

The Supreme Court tends to keep close to public opinion, because a judiciary shall hold their office during “good behavior,” not stating that they cannot be kicked from office. As stated before, chances of impeachment are little, but the chance still remains. If enough people disagree with a justice, no one is to say that enough people will not rally to impeach a Justice. After the controversy over Abe Fortas’s financial practices, the Court became wearier of its public activities. The Court usually follows the American Bar Association (ABA) Code of Judicial Conduct, and Common practice now dictates that justices remove themselves from politics, refraining from speaking out about controversial issues or pending legislation.

The Supreme Court also tends to keep close to public, because the Judiciary is usually made up of judges from different points in time. The justices hold their office indefinitely, and later when one retires, dies, or is impeached, a new judge is appointed. A mix of judges with different opinions and views work together in this judiciary system. The Supreme Court is made up of nine justices and eight associate justices whom are all appointed by the president and the “advice and consent” of the Senate if there is an open space. These judges, some new and some old have different views enabling only the best discussion and best decisions at the time available, which usually agrees with the people of the United States, otherwise they could rally and have the justices impeached.

The judicial branch is more independent then the legislature or the executive branch, yet they rarely deviate to far from public opinion. The Supreme Court is insulated from public opinion, because the Supreme Court Justices are appointed by the president not the people, and they may hold an office indefinitely until either death, retirement, or impeachment, However, they tend to keep close to public opinion, because a judiciary may be impeached if they do not maintain a standard of good behavior, and the Supreme court is made up of many different views, enabling them to discuss and act in the best interest of the people. The Judiciary Branch plays an important role in the United States; maintaining order through the US Constitution, and playing little role in politics to ensure that they maintain a straight forward non-biased system, protecting the constitution, and enabling no favoritism of any particular party.

About these ads

February 26, 2007 - Posted by | Politics

23 Comments »

  1. wow this is crazy I have a similar topic in my government class. I was unable to obtain any information anywhere I looked. Thank you for this information it really helped. ;)

    Comment by Samantha | March 23, 2007 | Reply

  2. Thank you so much, I have a AP gov test tomarro with an option of this free response question being on there. It has helped me so much!

    Comment by becky | April 18, 2007 | Reply

  3. yea, i have the same topic too!
    Thanks James Mulroy!

    Comment by Anon Imous | November 16, 2007 | Reply

  4. ME TOO!!!

    Comment by fELIPE sALAZAAR | November 16, 2007 | Reply

  5. this is really great info. i was having a hard time finding specifics and this really helped!

    Comment by Kim | November 18, 2007 | Reply

  6. EVERYBODY.

    Comment by your madre | November 21, 2007 | Reply

  7. I would appreciate if everyone could keep the comments a little more formal and stop plagiarizing my work.

    Thanks!

    Comment by James Mulroy | November 21, 2007 | Reply

  8. omgoshh thanks soo much!
    my AP gov essay prompt was EXACTLY the same!
    :O

    Comment by winnie | February 21, 2008 | Reply

  9. this is amazing…………thank you you godly man!

    Comment by Heather | March 17, 2008 | Reply

  10. Mine is the exact same as this one too!

    Comment by Laila | March 19, 2008 | Reply

  11. This should be used as a reference, not as a cheat guide thought!

    Comment by Laila | March 19, 2008 | Reply

  12. though* D:

    Comment by Laila | March 19, 2008 | Reply

  13. i ttly agree this site is AWESOME !!!
    thanx
    peace out…

    Comment by Julie | May 21, 2008 | Reply

  14. you have a lot of research but it doesn’t prove anything.
    and you don’t get to the point
    you are an idiot

    Comment by Vivian | December 11, 2008 | Reply

  15. this is wrong.

    Comment by nick | March 31, 2009 | Reply

  16. dude thanks alot this is going to help big time for my govt. final

    Comment by Paul | May 13, 2009 | Reply

  17. Oh, wow. This is the exact same question I’m having trouble on (2005 AP exam, right?).

    While the chapter for the Federal Courts unit in my textbook talks about the process of electing judges and such, it never really mentions how that ties in with public opinion. So thanks for clearing that up.

    This is a very well-written essay too. But if I ever mentioned websites as a source in my essays, the teacher would kill me, haha.

    Thanks again!

    Comment by Jessica | April 8, 2010 | Reply

  18. thank you!!! :)

    Comment by jazmin | April 29, 2010 | Reply

  19. no American has any constitutional rights because
    judges protect judges.
    judges protect prosecutors.
    judges protect the police.
    THEY ALL PROTECT EACH OTHER AND NOT YOU AND I.
    THE ONLY WAY WE CAN CORRECT THIS IS TO TAKE EACH STATES JUDICIAL REVIEW COMMITTEE OUT OF THE HANDS OF JUDGES AND PLACE IN THE HANDS OF A NEW STATE LEGISLATIVE JUDICIAL REVIEW COMMITTEE WITH ONE ATTORNEY ON THE COMMITTEE TO ACT AS AN ADVISOR. THIS ATTORNEY MUST NEVER HELD A PUBLIC OFFICE. IE: PROSECUTOR. NOTIFY EVERY ONE YOU CAN TO CALL THEIR CONGRESSMAN AND SENATORS AND STATE REPS. AND REQUEST A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT FOR THE SAME. THOUSANDS OF OUR SERVICEMEN HAVE DIED FOR OUR CONSTITUTION SINCE 1775 AND NOW OUR LEGAL SYSTEM IS MAKING THEIR JOBS EASIER BY PROTECTING EACH OTHER AND PISSING ON OUR CONSTITUTION.

    Comment by jerry | August 30, 2010 | Reply

  20. thank you this was very helpful
    but i would like to point that Justices are nominated by Presidents not appointed

    Comment by dave | January 11, 2011 | Reply

  21. We have become a society fixated on conquering the battle of the bulge. purchase Adipex online read more about phentermine here – http://phentermineonlinebuy.com useful information about phentermine. Though Atkins diet was first described The times when weight loss was restricted to crash diets, Atkins diet came over as the surprise.

    Comment by arehafedram | June 30, 2012 | Reply

  22. zpcgdbzwtaiu

    Comment by zktagwytatnv | April 20, 2013 | Reply

  23. In addition, it has been suspected of gastrointestinal, liver,
    varicella shellfish and milk. What is a Atr Vs Pox.
    Pre heat the oven to 350 degrees.

    Comment by Thelma | May 18, 2013 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: